Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Yadgaroff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. I'm going to add a {{cleanup}} and maybe add a References section. Deathphoenix ʕ 18:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anthony Yadgaroff

Non-notable person. Article is nearly unsourced, and nothing in the article or the references shows any evidence that this person satisfies WP:BIO. Valrith 19:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. MD of a company that may meet WP:Corp but we do not have an article on them yet. Catchpole 09:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, though the company, Allenbridge Group PLC, seems to pass WP:CORP based on this page's sourcing. - Tewfik^Talk 16:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete, Both Allenbridge Group PLC and Anthony Yadgaroff pass based on their noteriety in the Hedge Fund and Finance community both in London and elsewhere. Anthony Yadgaroff is a pivotal figure and has been cited in many print media articles. Analysts under Yadgaroff's direction and in his employee have been featured on MSNBC and Fox television news shows. This article just needs time to be properly sourced. User:Howard352
• Comment. The following Keep message was posted on my talk page: --18:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I have had a look at the WP: BIO page and do believe that Anthony Yadgaroff satisfies two of the categories, namely: - The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field; and also the alternative test - Google Test - Does a search for the subject produce a large number of distinguishable hits on Google or other well-known Internet search engine? With this is mind, I would appreciate it if you could reconsider the deletion of this article. Many thanks. Kimwatkins 16:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I think that "in charge of lots and lots of other people's money" should be accepted as a special case of WP:BIO. -TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 18:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.