Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Ulwick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anthony Ulwick
Businessman of dubious notability. Was tagged as a candidate for speedy deletion, contested at Wikipedia:Speedy deletions#Anthony Ulwick, then tagged for proposed deletion, which was removed without moving the article here. So, now, listing for a proper deletion consideration. Stormie 04:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. CEO of a well-established company, and author of two books - both which appear on Amazon.com. A simple Google search of his name receives 11,300 hits, and a similar search of his company turns up about 5,000 more. tmopkisn tlka 04:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per WP:BIO, "published authors ... who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work." According to amazon, his book has been favorably reviewed by other authors as well as executives at Microsoft, Johnson & Johnson, Motorola, etc. Scorpiondollprincess 16:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Current article is just an ad - look at the number of tags on it! Best to delete and start again. Dlyons493 Talk 00:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete obvious ad. JChap (talk • contribs) 01:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and expand - WP:BIO is satisfied, but the content is really light. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 01:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. In addition to the popular book(s) and the company, he apparently has been a speaker at a few conferences and him and his book are mentioned in third-party sources. —Centrx→talk • 00:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - the guy's book is notable but he is not. BlueValour 04:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.