Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Huang

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:20, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Anthony Huang

Not notable, attack page. Related to Sequanne McCargo (which is already on VfD). Just like the other article: delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 18:43, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete It seems very random. Definately not notable. Sonic Mew 18:48, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Probably could have been speedied.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 19:40, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Highly non-notable, potential attack page. jglc | t | c 19:51, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - per Ezhiki - either sarcastic or spoof of a vanity page. Blackcats 20:38, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Either vanity or attack page. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete attack page. JamesBurns 06:08, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Adds absolutely no useful information Anish7 05:51, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.