Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Anime Convention (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4 plus WP:SALTed. пﮟოьεԻ 57 16:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Another Anime Convention

Another Anime Convention (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

[1] and [2] demonstrates a complete lack of notability. I can't find any significant coverage in reliable published sources documenting this convention. I'm just seeing blogspot and primary, closely linked sources. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 00:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 00:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 00:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Does not assert notability as a con at all; no reliable sources could be found. Might need a dose of salt too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as twice recreated deleted article that still asserts no notability. Agree with the need for a little salting as well. Collectonian (talk) 01:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Thrice KTC (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and Salt. Reasons as noted above. --- Taroaldo (talk) 07:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G4 and salt as per above. KTC (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Couldn't find any news sources. Convention has only been running for two years, only sources in the article are the con-website and a con-report, has not had more than 1000 people in attendance. All these things would qualify the con as "under the radar" and non-notable. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 12:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete and salt per above. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 14:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as recreated, and salt to prevent further reiterations: It failed, it failed again, and now it's failing a third time. Utgard Loki (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.