Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous sex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Linuxbeak | Talk 00:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Anonymous sex

This is nonnotable. While there is a high number of results on yahoo, 22 million I believe, the vast majority are dating services or pornographic sites. Not very encylopediac in my opinion. If this page had any information relevant to the social phenomenon, or statistics, maybe this would be worth keeping...but it doesn't. freestylefrappe 18:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. While I don't agree that anonymous sex is an unencyclopedic topic for Wikipedia (we have an article on facesitting...), I will certainly say that right now the article is nothing more than a dicdef. --Jacquelyn Marie 22:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Well, it seems there's enough interest in keeping it that I think it will actually get improved upon. (I have started to not vote keep for anything that I think will just sit there, no matter how significant the topic is. Sad state of affairs, no?) Keep. --Jacquelyn Marie 12:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep and expand. Significant social phenomenon. Isn't there a human sexuality Wikiproject that covers this topic? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 22:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Content-free dicdef. --Carnildo 23:31, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Jkelly 00:34, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable phenomenon. Kappa 02:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Legitimate topic. While it is currently just a dicdef, deleting it will create red-links in Statutory rape and Casual sex. --Vsion 09:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, per above.  BD2412 ^talk 20:22, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand - surely there's plenty of information out there on this social phenomenon. Bobstay

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.