Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annette E. Padilla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as not meeting the criteria of the relevent notability guidelines. Pastordavid (talk) 02:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Annette E. Padilla

Annette E. Padilla (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Self Promotional & Non-Notable (or lack of notability locatable in a Secondary Source). Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 07:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Epbr123 (talk) 09:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 01:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Removed Self Promo Content and Non-notable. --Dieterman (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless third party sources can be found Alf^Photoman 00:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep She has some press coverage (dropping the middle initial yields a few more), BUT she is in a field that generates press releases and announcements, which doesn't automatically make one "notable", just announced. Jacksinterweb (talk) 01:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete the most promising-looking of the links in the article are actually links to sites that don't seem to have any content at all about the subject of this article. A reasonable attempt to locate sources comes up empty handed. JERRY ^talk _contribs 23:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't meet WP:BIO. RMHED (talk) 01:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.