Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Nova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 04:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anna Nova

Anna Nova (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only claim of notability is having won a Venus Award, which were presented for 3 years in Germany. I cannot find sources for this: the Venus Awards website does not have a list of past winners, her own personal website has nothing but a half-dozen photos of her, and the modeling profile linked at the bottom consists of nothing but a series of the same photo. (Also, her first name is spelled wrong). If the award cannot be confirmed, this article fails WP:PORNBIO and thus should be deleted. Natalie 04:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 08:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I didn't look into this, but I trust the nom since the article doesn't say much anyway. YechielMan 15:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. The spelling of the name is no big deal, as a simple page move can change that. If an external reference can prove that she's won the Venus Award, then she's possibly notable, and probably fulfills WP:PORNBIO, and the article should be kept. I'll go ahead and give it a shot and try to find some info on her. If I or the rest of the participating Wiki community can't find anything in five days, then we should delete. Rockstar (^T/_C) 06:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• It should also be noted that this page was translated from the Italian Wikipedia. Rockstar (^T/_C) 06:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Anyway, after a short search, I found her IMDB profile, which doesn't have any info on her Venus Awards wins, but IMDB's own Venus Awards page is pretty severely lacking for 2001, as it only lists one winner. Wikipedia's own Venus Awards page does list her (as Tara Young) as a winner in 2001, but as the nom said, the Venus Award's own webpage doesn't list winners before 2003... I don't know, it's a tough call, as she probably did win the award, but there's very little way to verify it. I could go either way on this one, but maybe it's good to err on the side of caution and possibly keep. But that said, I wouldn't care if we deleted it. Rockstar (^T/_C) 06:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per OR. the_undertow ^talk 08:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence as to the claim of notability is forthcoming in spite of the efforts of more than one editor. Arkyan • ^(talk) 15:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable; get rid of it. Jmlk17 19:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. 'Lemonflash^talk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.