Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Nicole (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anna Nicole (film)

Anna Nicole (film) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Speedy Delete non-notable upcoming film, crystalballism. Motorun0 20:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep As much as I hate anytime I see anything about Anna Nicole... the sources from CNN, Daily Variety and the Associated Press clearly establish notability. WP:CRYSTAL, as I understand it, does not apply to sourced details about a movie that's already in production. --JayHenry 20:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, the crystal ball policy is "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation" but this is verifiable, as JayHenry said. ugen64 21:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, it may be a future film but per Ugen65, the speculation is at least verifiable. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 00:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - WP:Crystal is not broken because WP:V is met. Brusegadi 02:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as verifiable and notable. Not Crystall-ballism. I'm curious as to the rationale for the nominator claiming "non-notable", considering the undeniable notability of its subject, plus the fact it's being produced by and stars notable personalities. 23skidoo 04:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Non-Notable????? Even though it looks a bit early (although the earliness of this is peanuts compared to this. That's easily meets WP:V and certainly will be notable due to the events that happened to Smith especially in the final months.--JForget 00:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Its subject is undeniably notable, and the movie is already in production, so there are verifiable details about the film. Neranei (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.