Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Everard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anna Everard

Is Wikipedia really a directory of everyone remotely connected to sports, such as physiotherapists? What's next? Dentists of Nobel laureates? No, sorry, I consider physiotherapists not notable. --DrTorstenHenning 14:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nonnotable NawlinWiki 14:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not covered in any independent sources (only those connected to the team, and only passing mentions). Kafziel 14:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom -- Whpq 15:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Dont delete a physiotherapist is important to the team, becasue they help the players get over injuries and warrants a non deletion user:Kieran Petty 17:58,15 August 2006
  • Can you offer a reason that is in keeping with our guidelines? By the way, when offering an opinion at AfD, it is considered good form to make it clear that you are the author of the article in question. Kafziel 17:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence that subject meets WP:BIO. Insert your own "what's next?" comment here. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Ohconfucius 03:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC) P.S. the author cannot spell: Please refer to physiotherapy.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.