Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Shoket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 10:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ann Shoket

Ann Shoket (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Editor of a magazine ... questionable about whether she's notable. Can't find anything in search engines that doesn't look puffy. Blueboy96 21:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep. Article hints at notability, just needs sources and categorization.Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 21:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable position at notable magazine. Added some categories. Canuckle 22:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as per Canuckle. Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 00:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Editor of a major magazine. Definitely passes WP:N. Horologium talk - contrib 03:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, I wikified and removed most of the PR language. It was also in reverse chrono order like a CV instead of an encyclopedia article.--Dhartung | Talk 04:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep editor-in-chief of a notable magazine, article asserts notability xC | ☎ 19:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.