Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal reviews

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 09:29, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Animal reviews

Not exactly sure what is going on here, but I am pretty darn sure it does not belong. Indrian 17:05, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikispam. Amusing site but no evidence of notability yet. Andrewa 18:27, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, website promo. Megan1967 04:34, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This is big in my office at the moment, so I say keep it up, although I know what you mean.

Comment: Please sign your votes and make them in the standard format, User:212.137.57.41, otherwise they don't count for much (they still do a little). No change of vote. Andrewa 09:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Is Wikipedia your office? No? Then Delete. Nestea 02:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- reviews on what, taste? smell? speed? No. - Longhair | Talk 04:34, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, spam. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:26, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.