Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal City
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus tending towards merging with Oral Fixation Vol. 2. bainer (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Animal City
Fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability. It's great that a different song replaced it as the second single from the album, but that certainly doesn't make this article worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. —Eternal Equinox | talk 02:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A never made song is not-notable. This could be called ex-post-facto-crystal-ballism--Fuhghettaboutit 02:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Very creative! :) —Eternal Equinox | talk 02:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Conditional keep until the album comes out in English. The song, according to the article on the album, is going to be on - it'll just be 4th instead of 2nd. If the album makes Wikipedia:Notability then someone can write up the song. If the album flops, delete this article at least. Bayberrylane 03:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if you understand what I had meant to intrepert. You see, the song was chosen as the album's second single, however, it was cancelled so that a different song could replace it. The album has already been released, to my knowledge. Therefore, I believe it doesn't require its own personal article. —Eternal Equinox | talk 03:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Then Merge it into the album's article as a section. Bayberrylane 13:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if you understand what I had meant to intrepert. You see, the song was chosen as the album's second single, however, it was cancelled so that a different song could replace it. The album has already been released, to my knowledge. Therefore, I believe it doesn't require its own personal article. —Eternal Equinox | talk 03:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as nn song. If the song is not a single, then they shouldn't have an article of its own. --Terence Ong 04:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Oral Fixation 2. Eivind 04:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Song is not independently notable and I don't see any sign it will become so. I reckon Hey You (Shakira song) needs looked at too. What's a "conditional keep"? Sounds like more work for somebody if that becomes a possible outcome. Deizio 04:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Oral_Fixation_Vol._2.
Monkeyman(talk) 05:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC) - Merge with Oral_Fixation_Vol._2 -- 127.*.*.1 21:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: why merge the article? Since the song was not released as a single, it is highly unlikely that one would type "Animal City" into the search menu. —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
