Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry black man syndrome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Angry black man syndrome

Angry black man syndrome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unnotable duplicate of Black rage (law), we do not need 2 articles on this one marginally notable topic. Thanks, SqueakBox 17:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• delete- per SqueakBox. futurebird (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• delete- Phoenix₇₄₁(Talk Page) 17:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom--Tom 17:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Black rage (law). I can see it being used as a search term. --Evb-wiki (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I boldly did this yesterday and was reverted, hence the afd. Thanks, SqueakBox 17:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom; OR and POV problems as well. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per SqueakBox. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• delete per all above--Zer0~Gravity ^{(Roger - Out)} 06:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per Squeakbox. Lawrence Cohen 17:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A1/A3 per nom. Article does not provide context for expansion and what little valid content (which is sourced) should be added to Racism in the United States or as SqueakBox suggested. JERRY ^talk _contribs 20:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.