Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry Video Game Nerd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy close. Basically, wrong venue; this is not an article, even when this is in article namespace (blame MediaWiki developers, not us). Unless there's a great big reason to keep the {{deletedpage}}s around, they can get deleted anyway after a few months; If there's hastier need to delete this temporary page, Deletion Review is the correct venue for that, as it specifically says in Protected deleted pages. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 22:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Angry Video Game Nerd
This article is false and useless. It has been protected on the grounds that it was deleted; but it was not, in fact, previously deleted. There has never been an article there. It should be deleted; if in fact someone wants to put an article there, they should have their chance to bring it to AfD and let the community decide on it. NOTE: There's no link on the page, since it was protected. Prosfilaes 14:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This isn't Deletion Review, where this arguement belongs. Also this page was protected to prevent a vandal from recreating the page Angry Nintendo Nerd. Wildthing61476 14:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment; this page was never deleted; why would it go to deletion review?--Prosfilaes 14:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment It's being treated as such however with the page protection. If you want to look into this more read this link here
- Speedy Close AFD is not the correct place to contest page protection also this was cleray protected due to it being an attempt to bypass the protection of the original Angry Nintendo Nerd article.--69.156.205.233 17:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment; this page was never deleted; why would it go to deletion review?--Prosfilaes 14:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.