Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Dalli (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Angelo Dalli

Anon tried to list this for afd, but ended up just linking to the previous discussion. I'm just cleaning up here and finishing the nom -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 02:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• D Per nom--Musaabdulrashid 02:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Despite my messing up trying to fix this nom a few times, since there isn't an opening reason for deletion, I looked at it myself, and am going to agree that he doesn't seem particularly notable. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Before all the mangling, I tried to move to delete. The CV reveals a fairly standard academic career, but the problem is that the article is a CV, and that's one of the things WP is not (Monster.com). The company doesn't appear to pass the bar, but the article is about him. Geogre 11:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for failing WP:BIO - nice history of publications, but nothing to distinguish from any other good academic, in particular, there's no multiple non-trivial articles by third-parties on Google. I also note a heavy edit history by anonymous IPs which appear to all originate out of Malta, leading to a question of WP:VAIN. Tychocat 11:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a resume site. --DarkAudit 12:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom, and the resume comment. rootology 06:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.