Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 13:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Angelo (band)

Angelo (band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reposted after speedy. One album, released a couple of weeks ago, no independent sources, I don't see the claim of notability but that might be systemic bias. Guy (Help!) 09:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Trying to promote the album Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 15:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - needs some work - ??? not allowed, also blood types are irrelevant. Please, get rid of that. Japanese rock groups are practically unknown just like Iranian - "Hypernova" - first Iranian rock team ever - still notable, even if they play at "Fat Baby" - a bar on Lower East Side. New York Times lent them a full page though, and I see that this Japanese group also has some references. Let them "go", give them brothers a chance (Monroe doctrine doesn't neccesarily apply here). greg park avenue 20:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete this article and Kirito and Pierrot. All articles fail WP:Music on the basis of what I can find on the web. Granted, however, that I cannot read in Japanese, so if it turns out they are actually the biggest band that Tokyo has ever seen then I will reconsider this vote. A1octopus 13:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Lukewarm Delete. If reliable source info were added, Pierrot would certainly be notable per WP:BAND and that, by extension, would make Angelo notable ("at least one member who was once a part of a band that is otherwise notable"). Closenplay 17:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.