Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Garnett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Ral315 (talk) 13:55, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Angelica Garnett

Was listed for speedy under A7, and it's true the article does not assert her notability, but she's linked to from several articles, so maybe the article just needs expanding. No vote from me yet. Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 10:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep if expanded; arguably notable by association, crops up reasonably often in literature on the Bloomsbury Group, also a published author in her own right. Haeleth 14:46, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep due to her involvement in the Bloomsbury Group. Someone will expand it eventually. Kewp (t) 21:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep all members of the Bloomsbury Group. Kappa 21:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• keep please she is a notable person not a speedy Yuckfoo 21:20, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Looks notable enough to stay. It could obviously use some serious expansion, though. -Haon 21:49, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Won a Joe Ackerley Memorial Prize for Autobiography in 1984 for Deceived with Kindness: A Bloomsbury Childhood. Notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 00:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Her autobiography deserves a synopsis; I'd do it myself if I hadn't read it so long ago. Tweeq 01:37, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.