Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Bella

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. SushiGeek 08:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Angelica Bella

Subject is hardly notable. No awards to her credit. Has roughly fifty films, if we are to believe IMDB (other pornography-oriented databases such as IAFD and AFDB list far less movies). Delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 21:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Isn't an IMdB listing of even one film, regardless of genre, enough to establish notability by our usual practices? Daniel Case 22:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• I wouldn't go that far. We've seen a number of cases with one IMDB entry that's an unreleased student film. However, in this case, the person seems to meet the porn standards for notability, such as they are. Keep. Fan1967
• I've personally noted that IMDB is fairly unreliable when it comes to following porn films, actors, and the like; sites dedicated to this genre tend to be better fleshed out and far more accurate. Just my view on the subject. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 23:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

"Fleshed"? Good choice of words there :-) Daniel Case 01:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep — I guess she has a sufficient "body of work" to be considered "barely notable", in am manner of speaking. We need a better standard for porn star notability. Maybe some types of awards? — RJH 17:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.