Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Singer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, there are nontrivial works discussing her art. --- Deville (Talk) 17:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Angela Singer

Doesn't pass WP:BIO, the first book has no mention of her in its author list on worldcat and the second doesn't seem to exist at all. Would say delete as non-notable. Localzuk^(talk) 18:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I think she passes WP:BIO because of the multiple reviews of her art. See the reviews section of the article. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. First book has essay discussing her work. Second also has essay discussing her work. Additional reviews added.Dmdesign 22:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:BIO needs to be stretched this way and that to find a reason to keep this person. Simply non-notable. Eusebeus 13:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Less categories perhaps? New Zealand biographical / New Zealand artists / British artists and artist-related article? Dmdesign 21:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Multiple reviews and descriptions of her work on various sites. Dismas|^(talk) 08:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, the sources and references meet my interpretation of WP:BIO. The books cited in the article are about her work, not by her. --MCB 22:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as above. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 02:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.