Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Russell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DISCUSSION NEEDS TO BE RESTARTED. This discussion has become a mess because new articles are being added to it during the discussion, and there is no way to tell which comments relate to which articles. I have contacted the initiator of the discussion with this concern, but they continue to add new articles. Please restart this discussion with a fixed list of articles. TigerShark 15:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Angela Russell

Minor figure from a local TV station and is seems very cruft like! Adam 1212 17:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

JianLi 18:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
JianLi 04:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all pure cruft. I tagged a couple a few with db-bio but they were turned into AfDs by an admin since a claim of notability is made. Still, these are still minor figures in a local TV station and are not of encyclopedic value. Pascal.Tesson 04:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Also moving here from their individual AFD pages (reason: related articles by same user, User:Pressure Thirteen)
JianLi 04:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
On the AfD for WPVI Personalities, I suggested to keep and merge back the NN articles. User:Kramden4700 supported deletion of the Personalities articles and created new sets of articles intended to be more concise:
These articles are not up for deletion here. I'm listing them here to give perspective on this bio issue. I will go over the nominated articles with a fine-tooth comb to see what I'd like to keep or delete. Tinlinkin 05:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete All Indiviually they aren't really notable, I guess, but on the other Reporters and Anchors articles I created is a bit better, since they as a group are notable. Kramden4700 05:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Monica Malpass If a special report of her divorce was really five whole pages long in the Philadelphia Daily News, then she is notable. Otherwise, delete the rest for non-notability and cruft, per nom. Tinlinkin 08:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • See Also:

Multi-article AFD

JianLi 06:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment These constant revision/additions are really messing up the flow of this AfD (and throwing off the headers). New articles really ought not to be added in the middle of the discussion. Agent 86 08:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed, this is turning into a bit of a mess. Anybody commenting here should be looking through each article, not looking at a couple and then commenting. They can't do that if articles are getting added during the process. I suggest that this discussion is restarted with a fixed number of articles. If any other are identified later, they should be added to a new discussion. Thanks TigerShark 10:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I added these to this deletion page, if that is ok. Adam 1212 15:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.