Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Kyodo Williams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Angel Kyodo Williams

Angel Kyodo Williams (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Is the subject notable? Zlllll (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep marginally notable ([1], [2], 5,330 ghits). Minimal effort nominations like these are unhelpful. JJL (talk) 03:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep A feature in the New York Times and her notability is being questioned? Jfire (talk) 03:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. You should be asking google first, not those who read and contribute to AfDs. As founder of the Urban Peace Project and someone with a NYT feature, the answer is yes. Celarnor Talk to me 04:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. Articel should be expanded though. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 07:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per Celarnor. Maxamegalon2000 13:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment if this person is notable, then why don't her group and her book have articles on them? Chimeric Glider (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per the sources available, which do need to be added. And to Chimeric, because Wikipedia isn't and never will be complete. A lack of related article doesn't translate to non-notability just as the presence of one doesn't mean another should exist TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep I have added some data culled from a few sources, including the New York Times feature which, it should be noted, is eight years old, as is the only book she has written. MovieMadness (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.