Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ang Kabanalbanalan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. I am having a difficult time determining if and when material has been merged from this article into the parent. There is a note on the talk page of the article suggesting an editor placed material on the subject in the parent article in September of 2007. All edits to the parent article in that time range have been deleted, obscuring contribution history, but deleted edits suggest that the material was rewritten, not merged and there is no note of a merger from this article in the edit summaries of the parent article (deleted or otherwise). A note of merger on March 4th doesn't seem to have been accompanied by any transfer of material, and the note does indicate that the material is already there. I'm assuming at this point that "merge" has been used in this AfD more in the sense of duplicated substance, not duplicated text. :) If in spite of my efforts to comb through the history here, there has been substantial transfer of material, the redirect should be placed in Category:Redirects from merges by placing the template {{R from merge}}. A null edit with a link to the destination article as set out at Help:Merge also needs to be made. Otherwise, redirect is sufficient, and it is within consensus that the redirect be protected if efforts are made to restore the article without sufficient sourcing to verify stand-alone notability. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ang Kabanalbanalan

Ang Kabanalbanalan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Notability is not stated for this radio program. The article previously survived an AfD, with the strong suggestion (but no consensus) that it be merged into Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus. The merge has been completed, but the article was recreated. I doubt that this article could ever contain more useful information than that in Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus, and is really only acting as advertising. I propose that we delete and redirect to Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus Papa November (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per Papa November. It isn't notable enough for it's own article. The part that was merged was taken out of the church article and it was listed as "See also" but should be merged back into the chuch article and deleted. Hatmatbbat10Talk to me 17:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you - I hadn't noticed that the merge was undone. I have restored the merge for now. Papa November (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Since it's been merged, we need to retain the history per the GFDL. cab (talk) 03:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Maxim_(talk) 14:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus as the merge has already been done. Protect the redirect if truly necessary. cab (talk) 03:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  • That sounds like a good solution to me Papa November (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.