Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy capper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Andy capper

Andy capper (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Re-created after being proposed for deletion: "Non-notable editor per WP:BIO. But perhaps Vice is an important magazine after all." Procedural nomination - no vote. - Mike Rosoft 11:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep [1] is a reliable source that establishes some notability. [2] is a trivial mentioning of the name and I don't think links to some of his published articles say anything about his notability. [3] also establishes notability, but it shouldn't be a reference to kevinbraddock.com, a self-published blog/site. It should be a reference to its publication in Tank Magazine — Ksero 13:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. None of the 3 sources you have mentioned establish notability of this individual. They only give him a passing mention. There is no "significant coverage" as required by WP:N. —gorgan_almighty 12:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: I've added a link to Vice Magazine on the page. It seems to be notable but I'm unsure of the notability of Andy Capper. Note: The article was created by User:Viceuk, which suggests a possible conflict of interest. - Snigbrook 14:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete; None of the sources are significant coverage about this person, so they fail to show notability. Unless such sources can be added, delete. Masaruemoto 04:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:N --Sc straker 18:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per others. Significant coverage is not presented so notability is not established. Doctorfluffy 08:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, marginal notability at best, the articles talk about Vice Mag more than Capper. This stub can really use improvement. Bearian 17:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.