Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AndyCarlson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - The subject is notable enough. There is no consensus to delete it. I note that the AfD was made by an inexperienced user, but the article should be judged on its merit regardless of who nominated it for deletion. - Richard Cavell (talk) 08:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Andy Carlson

Andy_Carlson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)
  • Comment doesn't appear to be a nominator listed but, I'd say Delete as non-notable musician with no reliable 3rd party sourcing. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Additional Comment I've had a look and it seems that User:Randy333 nominated it with "05:34, 30 May 2008 (hist) (diff) N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Carlson‎ (←Created page with 'Insufficient background information--more information needed for complete and accurate entry') (top) " this edit summary. I'm still learning towards delete but, feel for clarities sake that the fact of the AfD nom being this persons first contrib may need looking into. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, the stub only cites one source, and I don't think it passes WP:RS. I don't think the stub passes WP:BIO either. The stub might be an autobiography. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 00:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep, found a couple other sources, [1],[2], the article also might want to reference the ISBN of his book [3] and his self published CD [4]. As well as finding the New York times article that the other sources reference. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Needs work but notable: two-time state champion, state grand champion, Mel Bay author, recorded with famous bands. — eitch 07:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jonny-mt 05:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.