Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Tynan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 19:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Tynan

Not notable bio. -- Wikipedical 20:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as a non-notable biography, {{db-bio}} tagged.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  20:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Wikipedia is not paper, ample room for this, threshold should be very low when Petabytes are available. Snugspout 02:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. NN. Wikipedia is not a collection of people's bios. It is an encylcopedia. Non-encyclopedic content does not belong. Kershner 14:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as subject does not meet WP:BIO. Even if you want to observe a low threshold for inclusion, this article essentially says "John Doe went to school, got a job, got a promotion, and died." If that is the cut-off, I'm 3 for 4 on my way to my own Wikipedia article!--Isotope23 14:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.