Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Seaton-Elliott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. One keep vote (Kruzicka) is forged, and the other is unsigned. Neither one provides anything to overcome the delete reasonings. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Seaton-Elliott

It was nominated for speedy deletion, but I am not certain of its notability. I decided to let the community decide. Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 14:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. One experimental film (with merely "moderate" critical acclaim, according to IMDb) does not constitute notability. Tevildo 15:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete One indy short on IMDB does not make a notable filmmaker. Maybe by the time he's 25 (or even 21) he'll have some more credits. Fan1967 15:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep His video Fully Stockton headlined the Philadelphia Video Festival (see http://www.phillyvideofest.com/lineup.htm) in addition to being mentioned on IMDb. Kruzicka 14:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I met Andrew at the Philadelphia Video Festival and saw his film Fully Stockton. I was impressed with his work and what appeared to be an intense drive to create. His work is inspirational and the Wikipedia audience should most definitely be able to find more out about him.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.