Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Keith Arulanandom

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:24, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Keith Arulanandom

Non-notable. "Not known for any major achievement." I'd say Userfy but he wasn't logged in when he made the page. Nateji77 01:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. If he had a login account we could at least attempt to help him userfy, but that's not the case.EvilPhoenix
• Comment. I sent an email to the address I found on the referenced webpage suggesting he userfy. Up to him now - if he pops up, good, if not, delete. -- BDAbramson ^thimk 02:31, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. LouisRivera 02:55, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, obvious vanity. Megan1967 04:21, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. PedanticallySpeaking 16:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and welcome him to Wikipedia. Linuxbeak | Desk 18:03, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.