Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Bosworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by user:Caknuck as an attack page (CSD G10). Non-admin closure. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Bosworth

Andrew Bosworth (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seems to be a hoax... Neutrality^talk 06:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Unverifiable article with no sources and serious WP:BLP problems. --Metropolitan90 08:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The claims in the article prevent an A7, but they seem to be not real. --Dhartung | Talk 08:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Hoax. Also possibility that this is a libelous attack page in which case speedy would apply. • nancy • 10:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wholly inappropriate. A7 probably doesn't apply. /Blaxthos 12:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong/snowball delete per everyone, not verifiable.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete tag placed on the article.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: I have restored the AfD and DB tags, but removed the 'hoax' mention, as hoax is not a criterion for speedy deletion. - Revolving Bugbear (formerly Che Nuevara) 14:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.