Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andres brender

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk July 1, 2005 22:17 (UTC)

[edit] Andres brender

A good candidate for userfy, but most likely just delete. JeremyA 03:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete No point in userfying for an anon IP, and besides IP has only edited twice. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:59, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
  • You're right, userfy is the wrong word. I meant politely suggest to the anon editor that he might like to register for Wikipedia and make some useful contributions. I don't like to be too fast to declare vanity because, it seems to me that for a proportion of new users it is not so much vanity, more just a misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is for. JeremyA 21:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I get where you're coming from, but remember that in these parts, "vanity" isn't that much of a dirty word. We use it in the sense of "vanity press", and it just means an article written by its subject (or someone closely involved with its subject). That doesn't necessarily make it a bad article, or necessarily imply bad faith of the author. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:42, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 07:17, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Geogre's law failure: He can't be bothered with the shift key or listing any accomplishments (where you go to school isn't an accomplishment). Geogre 16:08, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 22:52, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn., vanity, self-promotion. jni 1 July 2005 06:25 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.