Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Spiliadis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. WinHunter (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Andreas Spiliadis

Andreas Spiliadis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article fails to meet the Wikipedia notability standards

I am also nominating the following related pages because it fails to meet Wikipedia notability standards:

Pamela Spiliadis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Elizabeth Skinner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Chris Baron (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Diana Kerns (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
  • Delete -- not notable, no third-party sources. Dylan 22:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - non notable, no need to merge to Baltimore Urban Debate League (a generator of stub wikilinks). Cate | Talk 13:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Do not Delete -- Come on, what does "notable" mean? Whoever nominated these articles is purely abusing a very vauge policy. These individuals are major people that have been involved in the creation, management, and success of the Baltimore Urban Debate League. Most biographies on Wikipedia (unless they're famous) don't have a third party source, and are original sources of info, plus I asked these people DIRECTLY what their information was. I can publish this information in order to make it "verfiable". I think it's unjust and unfair to just delete them though. Adam 15:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all as NN or merge one or two lines each into main BUDL article. So NN that my wife works for Balt City schools and never heard of BUDL itself never mind the people. He also dislikes "stupid stuff", whining, polka, and bad smells. She has two cats. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 02:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - the information content of all five of these articles is nil; it's mostly cats and tofu. --Bongwarrior 04:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - These are all NN. And comment - More importantly, I feel they trivialize your work on the Baltimore Urban Debate League article. Just looking it over you've got a lot of good work there and your project goal is admirable. But not every facet or BUDL is notable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EarthPerson (talk • contribs) 18:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.