Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andre Comeau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this individual does not meet inclusion standards set out at the notability guidelines. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Andre Comeau

Andre Comeau (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This person is not noteworthy. He only became publicly known as a result of his tenure on The Real World, for which in and of itself, people do not merit their own articles. None of the other aspects of his career gained him notability outside of fans of the original Real World, and all of it is unsourced anyway. The only sourced info is his year of birth, which I had to source myself. Nightscream (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate was been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions by Nightscream (talk)

• Delete per nom. Nightscream (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable per WP:MUSIC; the band he's in doesn't appear to have a page (the link points to a dab, where the band isn't listed). Not quite an A7 but pretty close. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Article was largely written by a single-purpose account (see here). Completely unsourced biographies of living people should be deleted. Whether or not the subject is notable is secondary. —BradV 01:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - Was going to delete and then noticed not small traffic to the article. Notabily is established from the TV show not from the Music. Added sources [1] [2] ChessCreator (talk) 04:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Fame from a TV show or from a MySpace music sample is all the same: essentially this is ephemera and not encyclopedic. If people are looking for him in a year (on an encyclopedia), there may be a need for an article. At present, it's like super happy fun ball. Utgard Loki (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.