Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andok's Lechon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 14:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Andok's Lechon

Andok's Lechon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

The title, Andok's Lechon, follows under wiki notability guidelines for deletion. Andok's Lechon is a single item on the menu of this fast-food chain. It is a pork product. Not only does a single menu item fail the notability criteria, but nothing in the article bothers to describe it. The majority of the content is around random bits of info about the parent company with a few references to poultry and beverage items. It includes a subsidiary company reference and an item on its menu also. Again, forking off onto a new topic.

This article had already once been nominated for speedy deletion for advertisement although the tag was removed without any explanation and again, the neutral point of view has been lost with the inclusion of emotional terms like "most popular...in the Philippines", "dominance", "very popular", and "sizzling". While these are normally minor edits, it does prove a history of reading like an advertisement.

Over all, this article has nothing to do with its own title. It also is too forked to be simply renamed and categorized as a stub. It titles to a pork product but the only food references included are for chicken and vegetable dishes. Perhaps the writers are having language translations problems, which would explain this: "Andok's Litson is one of the most popular roasted chicken products in the Philippines." That is not the name of a product they sell, it is the name of the company. Another irony is that Litson it also another Tagalog word for suckling pig, not chicken, (roasted or otherwise).

I would have no objection to separating this into an article about the company, provided it has verifiable sources and remained on topic with a NPOV. As it stands, it's simply a jumble of randomness. Lightertack (talk) 20:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete and rewrite as an article about the fast food chain rather than this mish-mash of half-developed themes. There is some potential here but it needs a complete reorganisation and rewrite. Pete Fenelon (talk) 02:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Maxim_(talk) 13:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.