Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andmartin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! - Mailer Diablo 21:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Andmartin

Band vanity. Does not appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Delete --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 15:53, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Just another case of myspace-muscles. PJM 19:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable, WP:MUSIC. Get a contract with a label, get a few albums out, and then come back. --StuffOfInterest 19:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. I can't see anything here that makes them encyclopedia-worthy. —Matthew Brown (T:C)
  • oh im sure band vaninty this is the bands number one fan and i want people to find out about them they have been asked to record very soon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.208.240.146 (talk • contribs) 16:54, December 1, 2005
    • Sorry, but wikipedia can only accept articles on subjects that are already notable. Please see WP:MUSIC. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 22:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • hey man i dont know where you live but in Salt Lake City there are quite a few people who have heard of their music and want to know more; ANDMARTIN IS THE BEST BAND EVER!!!!!!!! YOU CAN'T DELETE THEIR PAGE!!! Andmartin meets rule #7's criteria. "Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city" They invented their own style, and are prominent on the Salt Lake City scene

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.75.76 (talk • contribs) 20:49, December 1, 2005

You didn't finish reciting guideline #7: note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. In other words, you need to provide legitimate 3rd party media sources that will support your claims. PJM 03:34, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • yeah that dudes right they invented chick thrash metal thrash metal with chick vocals and their quite prominent on the SLC music scene, besides —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.41.230.24 (talk • contribs) 21:25, December 1, 2005
Then provide links to some affirming press articles here. PJM 03:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • it is undergroung most of their press is on web sites like this see www.myspace.com/andmartin and stop un htmling it will you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.208.240.146 (talk • contribs) 10:56, December 2, 2005
Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the html formatting you are adding to the page does not conform with Wikipedia style and therefore will be reverted. Peyna 16:03, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
    • It has to be a 3rd party reference. As for "un htmling", articles shouldn't use fancy colours and layouts. This is an encyclopedia, not a bulletin board. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 16:05, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • you want a third party source well then go to www.mmyspace.com/andmartin and look at all the people who love them please!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.41.230.24 (talk • contribs) 16:07, December 2, 2005
  • what the heck is myspace-muscle?!!!!!! You guys are just making stuff up!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.75.76 (talk • contribs) 17:02, December 2, 2005
  • Delete per nominator, having a myspace page does not make a band notable. Stifle 23:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.