Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andi "punk" anderson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. ~~ N (t/c) 23:31, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Andi "punk" anderson

Non-notable and/or unverifiable. Also seems to be attempted self-promotion. The only relevent hits for Andi Punk Anderson "James Taranto" are a Wikipedia User page and a WP mirror of the same page. Same for "Andi "Punk" Anderson" "David Peel" and "Andi Anderson" "David Peel". Created by User:Andrewzito, who is probably the same person as User:Andrew Zito. Niteowlneils 01:30, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

  • yeah, definately delete; probably vanity--Carabinieri 01:53, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete: A scenester from the good old days, but is a Geogre's Law failure (lower case surname), has no indication of any actual recordings done by him. The context listed is all legitimate, so far as I know, but we're left with the question begged of "so what?" Knowing those folks, living near other folks, jamming here and there...makes for great cocktail party banter, but not encyclopedic relevance. The other claim is that he ran the first BBS in Queens in 1990. That's possible, but it's highly doubtful, as I was on BBS's in lowly Durham, NC in 1990. I'm surprised if Queens had none until that year, when there were scores in Raleigh/Durham at the crack of 1990. Geogre 02:01, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  1. The discussion is not about David Peel
  2. The reference you provide first is a mirror/copy of the Wikipedia David Peel article, not independent confirmation. Niteowlneils 02:29, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as unverifiable. --Carnildo 03:46, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per Geogre. I think, if someone worked on it hard enough, one could find a few mentions in older print sources, for example, but... why? Who cares? --Jacqui M Schedler 15:43, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per Geogre. If we start cataloguing aging former music scenesters it won't be long before I get my own wikipedia article... and nobody wants that. As for the BBS argument, not verifiable and seems rather unlikely.--Isotope23 17:00, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unconvincing arguments for notability. Fire Star 17:10, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete I feel this isn't a article that Wikipedia should host since it seems so ephemeral to the music industry, ans seems not to have done anything notable.....Unsigned vote by Sinkholeca 20:25, 9 September 2005
  • Delete as per above.---CH (talk) 03:28, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.