Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anbeysivam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! - Mailer Diablo 03:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Anbeysivam

  • Don't delete it.

May be it seems like advertising. But it's not a commercial advertising. It's a PSA.—the preceding unsigned comment is by 61.247.252.205 (talk • contribs)

  • What a wonderful decision. The page must have to delete. I think it's not a good place to showcase such global thoughts. There are some people commented it's a first-person marketing drivel, I am sure these people never find a difference between marketing & PSA.—the preceding unsigned comment is by 61.247.252.205 (talk • contribs)

Delete first-person marketing drivel Drdisque 08:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete - blatant advertising. Blackcats 08:55, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't see a category in WP:CSD for advertising. Wish there were... Jamie 09:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • It' provoking. The global vision of the article, makes the article worth wise. If wikipedia delete it, it will seems to killing a man who is a wellwisher of world peace. Don't Delete it. This article shown an not-for profit organization, with global vision. Wikipedia has to support the article.—the preceding unsigned comment is by 61.247.252.205 (talk • contribs) - unsigned IP address (originally replaced nomination line with this)
  • Delete advert and poorly written at that. Arkyan 09:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Truly the world's uniting is all of Babelfish. I am in the voting of delete for great justice. --Last Malthusian 12:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
    • these comments on each vote are hilarious. keep em' coming.--Alhutch 16:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Please don't feed the troll. Just blocked the anon IP for 24 hours for trying to disrupt the process. --Gurubrahma 05:15, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

We think Last Malthusian, lost the Consciousness —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.247.252.205 (talk • contribs)

We think Movementarian thoughts, moves towards wrong side. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.247.252.205 (talk • contribs)

  • Comment: I'm glad this is on AfD rather than being speedied. Otherwise we would miss this wonderfully enlightening argument. All your article are belong to us. :) Jamie 13:21, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Advertising, peacecruft. -AKMask 14:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. AKMask put a false mask on a right think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.247.252.205 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete. I think we'd better extend the advertising section to apply to PSAs too. --Agamemnon2 14:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment :Agamemnon2 - do you think Open source environment and Closed environment are same things?. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.247.252.205 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete this is clearly advertising.--Alhutch 16:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • We think the thoughts of deletionism, having lost the consciousness of it the article of not sourcing and the awareness of the article verifying. But the killing of the wellwisher of world peace, we do not propose to make. •DanMS 16:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per AKMask. And I agree with Agamemnon2, adverts needs expanding for PSA's. Gonna write up a proposal now. -^demon 18:25, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete POV, advertisting. Jasmol 20:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Relist afresh, with someone watching contributions to weed out puppets and cabal members. --SockpuppetSamuelson 08:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Rampant advertising. --Gurubrahma 11:00, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete poorly written advert. KillerChihuahua?!?
  • Delete advertising, POV rubbish └ UkPaolo/TALK┐ 16:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Everything has been said, has it not ? ACH 19:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.