Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasis:Resurrection
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Relisting generated no opposition, the article has had significant expansion since its original nomination, and reasons given by two "keep" comments make it clear that this article should survive to be improved upon. Agent 86 00:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anastasis:Resurrection
A play; no evidence of notability. Redirect to Mehmet Murat İldan, its author, or delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-11-25 19:38Z
- Keep: a look at the other articles in the series (llisted in the article Mehmet Murat İldan) would indicate that these are work in progress by Tagorgora. So I would leave them be for now. I am confident that they will be improved by the author in due course. FYI, redirecting does not need to come to AfD per WP:BOLD. Ohconfucius 04:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Major works by well known authors deserve an article, and an editor should not be put in the dilmemma of haveing a stub deleted because of insufficient evidence or having a red link deleted because there was no stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 19:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.