Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchist law (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. No Guru 19:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anarchist law

Delete. Article has changed much since first nomination, but not in a satisfactory way. Furthermore there is absolutely no discourse on anarchist law to be found anywhere (like at [1]) Intangible 03:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete. Almost every relevant google hit I found was a WP mirror, which strongly suggests original research, neologism, etc. Seems like anything said here can and should be covered in Anarchism. dbtfz^talk 04:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Anarchism is already sizeable and takes a far broader view; there's really nowhere to merge this material. Vashti 11:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Strong Delete as per vashti. as per rehpotsirhc...I didn't actually look at the external links. --Strothra 20:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete - Besides having an oxymoron for a title, this article is 100% WP:OR. None of the external links seem to have anything to do with the subject unless you take the article's rather novel interpretation of them into account. Unencyclopedic. --rehpotsirhc ^{█♣█ ▪ Talk}
• Delete. The term is as much a contradiction as "anarchist government". It could probably be left as a redirect to natural law, which is the term used by those few anarchists who do use the word "law". Virtually no one uses the term "anarchist law", and over 90% of the google results when searching for the term are related to Wikipedia. In some ways it's also original research of a topic that really doesn't exist. Sarge Baldy 17:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Some adherents of anarcho-capitalism have a profound belief in natural law. Intangible 23:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Impossible to have Law and Anarchy. Startup account 23:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete As per above, a redir to Natural Law or a disambig would be better.--digital_me_{(Talk)(Contribs)} 03:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.