Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Priolkar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 04:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anant Priolkar

Anant Priolkar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

hoax Hipocrite - «Talk» 11:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

• • Correction, not a hoax, just a totally non-notable author. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep the Goa Inquisition would probably suffice as proof of notability, yet lacking sources and references make this article a little less than useful Alf photoman 15:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Tikiwont 19:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - He's been cited in academic journals, medical journals and other scholarly literature. Bad faith nom, nominator is involved in the whole censorship of Goa Inquisition issue.Bakaman 23:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The book alone justifies inclusion. Someone reading a citation to the book might wonder who the author is.Circumspect 07:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - He's been peer reviewed and wrote an important book on the goa history.--D-Boy 08:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. This article is fairly redundant with The Goa Inquisition (book). --Akhilleus (talk) 07:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.