Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analogdemon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was moved to MFD. NSLE _(T+C) 02:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Analogdemon

Intentional trolling, advocacy of illegal activities, pelicin shit reference Damicatz 01:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep: There is no intentional trolling. There is purely support for SPUI, harmless humor, and information about me. I don't see the problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Analogdemon (talk • contribs)
• Delete pelicin shit vandal — Moe ε 02:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• I reference the following :

Not to mention various personal attacks. Multiple admins have asked you to stop the trolling and you have refused - Damicatz 02:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I have a) Never vandalised a single page since I have been a member of Wikipedia, and b) what I'm doing is not trolling. I am merely supporting my friend SPUI and offering harmless humor. --Analogdemon (talk) 02:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

That kind of harmless humor is considered trolling. — Moe ε 02:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

By you, maybe. --Analogdemon (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

• Is this your idea of harmless humour? [1] - Damicatz 02:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. Just because you don't find it funny doesn't mean that nobody else does. And you don't have the right to not be offended. If you don't like my userpage, don't look at it. Quite simple really. --Analogdemon (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Except that your userpage acts as a representation of the Wikipedia community as a whole. - Damicatz 02:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh but it doesn't. I'm not into make believe and pretending. My userpage represents me as an editor, not the whole community. --Analogdemon (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep. This is a user page, it is not trolling. This AfD only demonstrates the existence of Jimbo's censorous cult of personality. Users who agree this AfD is uncalled for should comment on User:Karmafist/manifesto. ‣ᓛᖁᑐ 02:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. It is blatant trolling. I quote an edit summary : "And we'll have fun, fun, fun 'til the admins take my user page!" - Damicatz 02:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Again, harmless humor. I was purely poking fun at the fact that certain admins have acted like Nazis about this. --Analogdemon (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

• Conditional keep - get rid of those disputed userboxen, please (the green ones - I'm perfectly fine with the SPUI support one, but only if it's in text (like it was on Karmafist's page, and not in template form). NSLE _(T+C) 02:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. I see nothing there that warrants a deletion discussion. --Carnildo 02:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• AfD is not the appropriate venue for user page discussions. Please go elsewhere, quickly. Thanks, fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 02:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.