Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anal stretching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (you know where you can shove it but we don't provide the instructions) Yomangani^talk 01:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anal stretching

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide nor is it a dictionary. Nothing within this article is actually referenced and the bunch of external links at the bottom are not valid citations so I say delete this and salt the earth. SamKinney 23:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This does not seem to meet any specific criteria for deletion. Kukini 23:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Changing my vote. Kukini 03:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but note that not meeting specific criteria is not a reason to keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarkov (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom. Tulkolahten 23:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Mig ^(Talk) 23:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable; the relevant references given are from someone's wiki and a blog--neither of which would likely be a reliable source. Heather 00:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Has general unsourced POV statements like "Mainly used by homosexuals" etc. Gross to say the least anyway... Spawn Man 02:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.*Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.*Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.
• Keep; I think this is an actual practice and I assume it could be referenced properly.

Everyking 06:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per Everyking. Anal stretching is not at all "unverifiable," the article just isn't in a good state with regards to WP:V. It would be easier to fix it from the starting point that exists there now than to start over. Mangojuice^talk 18:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete How to article. Edison 20:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. RFerreira 02:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom probably already covered in Butt plug and then salt.--John Lake 19:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Incoherent, or something... --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 01:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Goatse perhaps? Chris Buckey 05:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a howto nor is it a place for dicdefs -- Tawker 07:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Anus (insert punchline here). Just H 20:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - is a legitimate concept that needs to be referenced {Re: Delete: How to article If it's a how-to article then it should be amended, not deleted | Re: Delete: as unverifiable -- is not a case for deletion, unless you're saying that anal-stretching is unverifiable in general, i.e. that no such thing exists | Re: Delete: Has general unsourced POV statements -- is also not grounds for deletion [See: Amend comments]} —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfwoolf (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.