Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Weber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — FireFox ^(talk) _{14:31, 27 August 2006}

[edit] Amy Weber

DELETE Due to lack of information and interest, this page should be deleted.MgHoneyBee 18:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep appeared on national TV weekly for several months while also becoming a notable playboy model... and while apart of WWE she became a household name. thats notable enough to me --- Paulley 21:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Amy Weber is a beautiful model. One of my all time favorites. She has made a success of herself. Please do not delete.Bengalman2006 02:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Other ex-Diva Search women such as Rochelle Loewen and Rue DeBona still have their articles, as do other women who were only on WWE TV for a short time such as Hiroko Suzuki. It's a notable person (I know I recognized the name) and so-called "lack of interest" wouldn't seem to necessitate deletion. If you think it lacks information--well, that's why it's a Wiki! Tag it with a stub. -Umdunno 15:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep -Maybe not notable for me, but definately notable for more than a few. No reason to be deleted FancyPants 15:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I searched for her on Wikipedia - I'm sure there are others want the information as well. -Bejhammond 23:25, 20 August 2006 (BST)
• Strong KeepFor reasons stated above--Cowboy From Hell 13:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)DJ BatWave
• Strong Keep per Paulley. The page needs to be improved though. TJ Spyke 06:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep she is notiable due to her involvement with the WWE. Size of an artilce is not a good reason for deletion and not being interested in the person is certainly not criteria. --Edgelord 19:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Saying that she's a "household name" is a bit of a stretch, but she's notable enough for her TV work. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:53, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep — per Umdunno. Dionyseus 22:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. If she has appeared in so many editions of Playboy, even without being PMoM, she's probably notable enough. Ohconfucius 04:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Blood red sandman 13:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -Lan Di 00:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep She seems notable enough to me, however this article needs a good cleanup. KZF 03:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Lack of interest according to who? Speedy keep is suggested at this point. RFerreira 08:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.