Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Thomas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The article is quite poorly written, but it does contain valid assertions of importance. However, as the consensus below clearly believes, the subject does not have sufficient notability to warrant an article. -- Mike (Kicking222) 20:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Amy Thomas
Subject is not notable Wildhartlivie 12:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Well, I do not think that the subject is not notable. She is a child star and a possible future teen/adult sensation as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 12:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - The trouble is that outside of a myspace page and a vidzone page, both of which are self-promoting, the only other outside info I could find on her was a page that said the supposed record label signing was more of a sham and the website connected to the label only consisted of a petition about downloading. In any case, there's nothing new on her since this article, and the event it discusses occurred. I can't find evidence of her being a child star.
- Delete - Non-notable. Someone can write an article about her when/if she becomes an adult sensation, not before. --DAJF 13:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of notability, full of weasel words too. TJ Spyke 23:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO, obviously NN. L337 kybldmstr 23:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as completely subjective - "shot to fame"? NN per L337 kybldmstr, TJ Spyke and nom. Bearian'sBooties 00:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet WP:MUSIC – Tivedshambo (talk) 16:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.