Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Street

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! Mailer Diablo 09:41, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amy Street

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Hoax. No relevant Google hits - and the author had the bare-faced cheek to ask me why I deleted it! Just to cover myself, I will say: or nn-bio. -- RHaworth 19:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

No, really not a hoax. I'm sorry if it looks like one but it really isn't. Delete it if you must but it is real.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fr34 (talk • contribs)
Take a look at Wikipedia:Verifiability to see how you can prove this is not a hoax, if it isn't. Thryduulf 19:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless proved to be not a hoax. I have to say in its favour though that it is a hell of a lot more NPOV than the version I deleted earlier today. Thryduulf 19:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry for wasting your time, I don't think i'll be able to find any information in reputable articles or anything so you may delete it - sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fr 34 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 7 February 2006
  • Delete Unverifiable Avi 20:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. (I tagged it for speedy deletion originally.) --Phronima 20:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and WP:V. --Kinu 00:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • keep you must keep this article. i will come back with truth.
  • Delete. No evidence of notability nor verifiability; supported by anon who has made attack and dubious edits. -- Infrogmation 13:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Not much comprimise is there? Come on I'm not lying —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fr34 (talk • contribs)
    • One of the core principles of Wikipedia is Verifiability. If something cannot be independently verified then it will be deleted, regardless of whether it is true or a hoax. Follow the link to learn more. Thryduulf 20:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for at least accepting it might not be a hoax - you should get rid of it as the article can't be varified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fr34 (talk • contribs)

The west-midlands transexual alliance asks Wikipedia to keep the Amy Street article!

I know this information is true, please keep this article

I dont care wether its deleted or not but it seems like theres alot of people who want it to stay What losers would go that far just to offend someone =\ just my opinion *Shrugs* —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.67.208.242 (talk • contribs) , (IP's first edit).

Good point! But that still doesn't count for making the article true, as we can't find any complete evidence to back up the article. I give up! Just delete it guys, theres nothing that we can do. Its local intrest anyway - not like anyone outside Birmingham cares!


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.