Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Reid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-09 07:58Z

[edit] Amy Reid

Amy Reid (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article as it stands now does not argue notability per WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Tabercil 21:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable per nom. The fact that she has been in only four films, and has now apparently retired, suggests that the article will never grow beyond a stub. Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 23:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I seem to recall WP:PORNBIO used to require 100 films listed on iafd, well whatever it is now 4 is not enough without multiple non-trivial works. If anyone finds those notify me and I will change my vote accordingly. Quadzilla99 17:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, only four films are mentioned in the filmography section in the article. A check on IAFD shows 52 films to her credit, which is still well shy of 100. Tabercil 23:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails all notability criteria, and has no verifiability via secondary sources. Valrith 21:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• it is interesting and should be undeleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.91.37 (talk • contribs) 23:27, February 6, 2007

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.