Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ampland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 09:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ampland
Does not assert notability, does not appear to pass WP:WEB. brenneman(t)(c) 12:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Appears to be hugely popular porn site. Over 2 million google hits. --Fuhghettaboutit
13:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- I don't think this falls under 3rd party source guideline. Huge numbers in and of themselves assert notability. --Fuhghettaboutit 01:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB unless external 3rd party sources are cited verifying its notability. Zunaid 15:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as nn website. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete... I guess. Aaron's link shows no hits on Google NEWS, but I get 3 million on Google web search. But looking at them, it looks like a lot of them are linkfarms. So there's some serious SEO action going on and it's hard to tell what the real deal is. So, as Zunaid says, without some 3rd party sources to verify it's hard to trust only google. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rodii (talk • contribs) .
- (Whoops, sorry! —rodii 04:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC))
- Delete per nom, unless notability can be proven Mushintalk 02:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, Alexa rank 4,125. Kappa 02:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Kappa. --bainer (talk) 04:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as notable (per Kappa) and verifiable. Ifnord 03:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.