Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Yungman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE NSLE (T+C+CVU) 01:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Amit Yungman

No google hits, no sources cited, unverifiable. See also WP:MUSIC. Kappa 19:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as per Kappa. holy crap, did I just say that? did KAPPA just want to delete something? the sky is falling!! ;)  RasputinAXP  talk contribs 19:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. If Kappa thinks it needs deleted, it's hard to argue otherwise. Peyna 21:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom. Jkelly 00:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, clearly, per all of the above. And implement the Wikipedia:Kappa Deletion System to he can speedily delete at will, without Afd. When Kappa says "delete", you know the article is unsalvagable. Friday (talk) 00:22, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Kappa voted to delete Yellowikis. It is still here. Making him an admin would be better. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, unverifiable vanity. - Mgm|(talk) 10:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unverifiable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete under A7, no claim to notablily, vanity. --Aranda 56 00:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
    • "his first show was infront of about 10 THOUSEND people!!!"" Kappa 01:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per CSD:A7, or just ordinary delete if a show "infront of about 10 THOUSEND people" is a valid claim of notability. Stifle 13:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.