Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Jensen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, with no prejudice for recreation if reliable sources can be found. Tim Vickers (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Amin Jensen

Amin Jensen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I, as the creator of the article, think that he is notable as a stand-up comedian and actor, but it was tagged as csd and I would rather have consensus decide this article's fate rather than one admin. Editorofthewiki (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Notability isn't a matter of opinion - the guidelines are set out in Notability (people). The article doesn't show that he meets them. JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • If someone could translate the many websites about him in Danish then I'm sure he would be cerified notable. Editorofthewiki (talk) 22:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless evidence of notability via reliable sources are provided. Terraxos (talk) 03:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete It is not notable, but I commend the nominator for nominating the article for AfD instead of just removing the csd RogueNinja_talk 19:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
• keep until it is shown that none of the 166 hits on google news and over 30,000 on google are reliable sources or more than trivial mentions. --Paularblaster (talk) 00:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Please read WP:V, in particular, the burden of proof section. RogueNinja_talk 01:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Just as soon as you read Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Reasons for deletion :o) --Paularblaster (talk) 10:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• I did. And I quote: "## Subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)" RogueNinja_talk 11:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

But you somehow missed "All attempts to find reliable sources in which article information can be verified have failed": if you don't do that first, you can't know whether it fails WP:N or not. --Paularblaster (talk) 12:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

You dont have to do that. Its a list of reasons. The article needs to only meet one reason, not all of them. RogueNinja_talk 00:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I'd suggest that you do have to do that, as recommended by Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#Nomination: "You must look for, and demonstrate that you couldn't find, any independent sources of sufficient depth." --Paularblaster (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.