Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amerispanic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Amerispanic

Non-notable and nothing but a definition - Rudykog 09:03, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: dictdef with spurious photo. Jamie 09:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or Move to Wiktionary, but definitely delete the photo. Thesquire 09:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong and speedy delete as copyvio from [1]. Except for that site and Wikipedia mirrors the term has virtually no Google presence. It's also vanity: same portrait on the creator's homepage. Durova 09:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - already deleted several times from Wiktionary - so please don't move it there. Jeff Knaggs 10:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. To late to speedy, but I tagged it as a copy vio per Durova's information. That has the fortunate side effect of getting rid of the photo. Movementarian 10:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Someone removed the copyvio central listing, but the copyvio tag is still in place on the page. (I reverted the removal of the listing, but reverted my revert because I was unsure of what to do.) A person claiming to be the owner of the source website says he grants permission to Wikipedia to use the definition, but the claim in the Talk page is unsigned. Noelle De Guzman 12:08, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.