Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americans for Dr. Rice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Draft Condi movement. --Coredesat 05:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Americans for Dr. Rice

Americans for Dr. Rice (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Advertisment. No legit notability in article. No notability in any linked persons. No references or sources. External links are all promotional. Btl 06:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as content is redundant to Draft Condi Movement. Feeeshboy 06:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep a Million plus google hits. Just tag it as unsourced to encourage proper editorial efforts. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 06:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• A million? I count 183. Your count is off by about 3 orders of magnitude. --Calton | Talk 16:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Let 'em get their publicity elsewhere. --Calton | Talk 16:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per Feeeshboy. Seems to have a decent amount of coverage but content is redundant. Arkyan 16:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect --Dookama 01:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• keep She is N enough that this will not disappear. One of the comments above might be taken to indicate a political bias as a motive for deletion. DGG 05:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Draft Condi Movement as duplicative. Otto4711 16:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.