The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 18:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Please see this version. This is a copyvio which claims permission. It looks non-notable to me, at least there is no claim to notability in the article. --best, kevin └KZOLLMAN/ TALK┐ 01:07, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete as non-notable. Judging from the past few days, it looks like people aren't interested in voting about the copyvios that claim permission. -- Kjkolb 23:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete looks like a load of crap. JBH 22:23, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete for copyright violation. would love to see an actual article on this organization Sethie 07:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.